Especially now that I've looked at the results after voting, this does seem quite complicated... I see that 50% have voted not to have any restrictions or separated voting, but then 50% have voted for separated voting... And then A number of the 5C proposals have a decent number of "for" votes (and a good number have an overwhelming number of "against" votes).
It seems that there are a lot of options and, while that's good and has probably given people a better idea of exactly what they can expect from restrictions/separated voting, I wonder exactly how this is all going to work out. If five different options all gain sufficient "for" votes to be implemented, does that mean they'll all be implemented? Will any of those votes matter of the majority seem to indicate in their first response that they aren't interested in either restrictions OR separated voting?
I feel like maybe this was too many options, especially because people can vote "yes" more than once, resulting in ties or near-ties in a lot of cases. But then, maybe this will open up more discussions...? The numbers just don't seem to make a lot of sense to me, but then I was never very good at Math... :p
no subject
It seems that there are a lot of options and, while that's good and has probably given people a better idea of exactly what they can expect from restrictions/separated voting, I wonder exactly how this is all going to work out. If five different options all gain sufficient "for" votes to be implemented, does that mean they'll all be implemented? Will any of those votes matter of the majority seem to indicate in their first response that they aren't interested in either restrictions OR separated voting?
I feel like maybe this was too many options, especially because people can vote "yes" more than once, resulting in ties or near-ties in a lot of cases. But then, maybe this will open up more discussions...? The numbers just don't seem to make a lot of sense to me, but then I was never very good at Math... :p