Hm, thinking about it from a job-seeker perspective, this is often used by interviewers to gain insight into how the applicant operates (god only knows I've had enough of those interviews...)
Anyhow, instead of asking, "How are you at leading?", you could always say, "Given a choice, what kind of role do you prefer to take on a team? Eg leader, supportive, finishing, planning..." that way the response might be a bit more natural and informative.
I like the two members not getting along question!
-You're given: the ability to attack enemies, OR the ability to defend your allies. What ability would you choose? Give reasoning.
-The traditional 'lost property' question - you find a hundred dollar note on the ground, what do you do?
-Could always try a 'prisoner's dilemma' type question. You and your party have been arrested for stealing an artifact. You are guilty.
You are given the choice - confess your involvement, rat on your team mates, and receive a much reduced sentence, or hold out and plead not-guilty, because the evidence is shaky. But if you do, and your other team members DO confess and rat on you, then you will receive a very heavy penalty. How do you choose what to do? Do you take the bargain, or do you hold out hope you can thwart the authorities?
no subject
Anyhow, instead of asking, "How are you at leading?", you could always say, "Given a choice, what kind of role do you prefer to take on a team? Eg leader, supportive, finishing, planning..." that way the response might be a bit more natural and informative.
I like the two members not getting along question!
-You're given: the ability to attack enemies, OR the ability to defend your allies. What ability would you choose? Give reasoning.
-The traditional 'lost property' question - you find a hundred dollar note on the ground, what do you do?
-Could always try a 'prisoner's dilemma' type question. You and your party have been arrested for stealing an artifact. You are guilty.
You are given the choice - confess your involvement, rat on your team mates, and receive a much reduced sentence, or hold out and plead not-guilty, because the evidence is shaky. But if you do, and your other team members DO confess and rat on you, then you will receive a very heavy penalty. How do you choose what to do? Do you take the bargain, or do you hold out hope you can thwart the authorities?